Sharply rising interest rates would be catastrophic, especially in such an indebted economy. A sudden tightening of liquidity and financial cost would push many enterprises into bankruptcy and lead to massive unemployment. Another measure is to invite companies to swap short-term bonds for long-term bonds.
- Precision Service Experience;
- Navigation menu;
- Subscribe to read | Financial Times?
- Paragon (A Science Fiction Romance Novel).
- The best disinfectant.
- Subscribe to read | Financial Times.
- We've detected unusual activity from your computer network.
Struggling SOEs that no longer generate any profits and companies with a poor credit-rating are among those on the blacklist in the swap plan. The central government has declared it will not bail out companies for any losses under the plan, which is still optional for now. Bankruptcies are still a rather new phenomenon in China. Coverage was extended in to other types of companies, including enterprises funded by foreign investors and joint ventures.
But filing for bankruptcy remains a very tortuous process. Many more Chinese companies simply go out of business. Rising domestic interest rates and stricter regulations make offshore fundraising look more attractive and less expensive. This incites companies to invest and sell their products abroad.
Their investments are notably welcomed by European markets desiring to open up to Chinese companies. Higher US interest rates also play a role. Chinese businesses offered 87 billion dollars in overseas bonds from January to April Cho, b. Debt issued abroad by Chinese businesses nearly tripled from Meanwhile, other firms, such as Fosun and Wanda, are betting on Chinese economic transition to services and internal consumption. As such, overseas debt has grown exponentially.
According to the Bank of International Settlements, banks in China reported outstanding cross-border claims of billion dollars and liabilities of billion dollars in June Bank of International Settlements, Many of the reporting banks were affiliations of foreign institutions, representing some 35 different nationalities. This makes China the 10 th largest cross-border creditor in the international banking market Bank of International Settlements, The BIS indicates that foreign claims on Chinese residents, including local claims made by affiliations of foreign banks in China, amounted to 1.
Though this is an enormous sum, the total amount of claims has actually been decreasing from 1. Most of the growth in foreign claims on China examined by the BIS has taken the form of credit to banks. The outstanding stock of these interbank claims accounted for more than half all international claims. Much like the total amount of claims, the sum of claims on banks has been declining from billion dollars mid to billion in mid By contrast, foreign claims on Chinese non-bank private sector has grown continuously, quadrupling to billion. While the issuers consist mainly of financial institutions, as seen previously, other sectors are also getting in on the act.
China Eastern Airlines issued billion yen worth of debt on the Tokyo Stock Exchange in March , stocking up on yen for payments as it centers its services on Japan Cho, b.
- Lets Look at a Bulldozer!.
- China’s Coming Financial Crisis and the National Security Connection.
- Fantastisches Nordhessen: Bilder einer märchenhaften Region (German Edition);
- China’s Shadow Banking Sector: Considering the Risks.
- Growth Targets?
- The Power of Sunlight.
- Inside China S Shadow Banking: The Next Subprime Crisis?.
- Add Comment.
- Mr. Modems Top 50 iPad Tips, Volume 2.
LGFVs are also among those who have raised money with overseas bond offerings in Financial regulators are keeping a close watch on their investment strategies. Domestically, such bonds are considered to have the tacit banking of central or regional authorities—local government bankruptcy is illegal. But it is unclear whether Beijing would pay foreign investors back in case of a default on debt. In fact, past experiences point to the opposite scenario.
Foreign creditors were repaid in accordance with international law, which means they did not recover the totality of their investments Farley, The Chinese government is continuously restructuring Chinese companies and institutions so that they can be listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, which facilitates borrowing abroad. Arguably the biggest development in the past few years has been the advent of Stock Connect, an institutional link between foreign investors and mainland China markets Dunkley, Before the implementation of Stock Connect, only professional foreign investors could apply for a special license to invest in mainland shares, and only a limited amount were available for purchase.
Non-professional foreign investors now have the liberty to peruse wider segments of the mainland markets. But a minefield of uncertainties will await fund managers who will be obligated to pour millions of US dollars into mainland shares after MSCI, a New York-based indexing group, decided to include some Chinese A-shares in its main global indexes Kynge, The objective is to pay the pensions of the employees that take part in the scheme.
They manage very big amounts of money that are usually invested on the stock markets or financial markets.
Choose your subscription
Active funds are judged against the benchmark and will now feel great pressure to buy A-shares too Flood, Though MSCI has included Chinese A-shares at a sliver of their value, and though the A-shares will only make one percent of its emerging market index, the move is still provoking major excitement.
Three mainland companies are particularly popular among investors—Kweichow Moutai, a white liquor producer, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology, a supplier of video surveillance products, and Midea group, specialized in air conditioning. All these companies bet on middle class consumers and internal consumption Sun, Another thing these groups have in common are solid accounting and limited liabilities.
Other companies face similar challenges—mainland firms have much progress to make in terms of financial transparency and investor protection, according to major investment houses like Aberdeen Standard Investments Sun, Only 57 or the have been selected for investment by the active funds surveyed by Copley Fund Resource, a global advisory firm Dunkley and Kynge, Some Chinese companies use a variable interest entity structure, which favors founders over other shareholders.
Furthermore, the ownership risk for foreign investors is increased due to legal uncertainties—some A-share firms have close connections with shadow finance. As such, major Chinese companies have faced major difficulties after borrowing and investing huge sums abroad, worrying Chinese authorities. Chinese giants—grey rhinoceros, as the Chinese press calls them—have started investing in a myriad of sectors and industries often unrelated to their original business. Their gluttony has not gone unnoticed.
Once such firm is HNA. Since , the group has invested more than 40 billion dollars abroad, accumulating liabilities worth billion dollars for a total of assets worth billion dollars Escande, The group has acquired 9. Chinese investors bet on politics. They wager that since the Deutsche Bank is an institution of paramount importance in Germany, its assets are guaranteed by the German government. Since politics are never far from economic investment in China, central authorities have called companies like HNA to order.
China remains a state-controlled economy. Though Beijing initially encouraged state-owned enterprises and other major companies to invest abroad, partially in an effort to lessen overcapacity issues, it is now alarmed by the abyssal levels of debt contracted by HNA. On the 18 th of August , the State Council clarified the role of regulatory institutions, stipulating that investing in casinos, pornography, money games, or investing in a manner contrary to the national interests of China was forbidden.
Approval of authorities must be granted for investments in sports, real estate and entertainment. Conclusion: Will Chinese debt levels cause a new financial crisis?
In , the financial crisis was caused by massive credit defaults on toxic loans in the US financial and banking system. But would a slowdown or credit defaults in China bring down the world? Pessimists might argue that a crisis in the second world economy would be sufficient to wreak havoc on the world financial system. If a credit crisis erupted in China, it would probably not be as damaging to the world economy than the American financial crisis. We can also look at the past for examples. In , Asian emerging economies faced the deflation of a real-estate bubble, but this did not lead to a global credit crunch.
Is a crisis likely? In the first part of this report, we asked ourselves whether Chinese corporate companies were overleveraged. We can now answer with certainty that this is the case.
IS CHINA IN THE MIDST OF NEXT FINANCIAL CRISIS???
Being too brusque or a contrario ignoring the rising problem of debt would likely result in a full-scale crisis. In this context, it is difficult to ascertain whether Beijing would be able to contain a full-scale credit incident or banking crisis. As we have shown in the historical section of this study, central authorities have recapitalized national banks in , , and on other occasions.
They could bail-out the banks again in the event of a credit incident. But credit-fueled growth has shown its limits—and buying out all the NPLs accumulated by the banks would not change the system that produces overleveraging, just clear the way for more borrowing. Beijing is faced with the delicate task of balancing deleveraging with sustained growth. Dealing with these two concerns will require decisive reforms. Not only are companies struggling domestically, but they have exported their difficulties internationally with excessive borrowing.
In real terms, this financial and commercial integration implies that massive Chinese investments and loans finance the construction of deep-sea ports, train lines, roads and highways, nuclear and coal power plants. As of , 78 countries and international organizations had signed cooperation agreements with China under the BRI Kynge, a. A series of controversies have flared in countries such as Malaysia, Cambodia, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with regards to debt sustainability. Its first mission was to support the new system of standard exchange rates.
When the Bretton Wood fixed rates system came to an end in , the main function of the IMF became that of being both policeman and fireman for global capital: it acts as policeman when it enforces its Structural Adjustment Policies and as fireman when it steps in to help out governments in risk of defaulting on debt repayments. As for the World Bank, a weighted voting system operates: depending on the amount paid as contribution by each member state.
The other member countries are divided into groups led by one country. Not only are the borrowing countries fragile, but the Chinese companies involved in the BRI face debt problems and build, invest and operate projects that are highly leveraged themselves. There have been signs of a policy reassessment in Beijing.
As we have detailed throughout this entire report, central authorities are seeking to prevent further shaky credit expansion.
Eight Questions: Joe Zhang, ‘Inside China’s Shadow Banking’ - China Real Time Report - WSJ
The world economy is still very fragile and many countries, including Eurozone countries, have not completely recovered from the Great Recession. The trade wars announced by US President Trump will contribute to this fragility.
Companies already facing difficulties may not be able to pay the steep tariffs and go bankrupt, threatening Chinese jobs. In this context, the central government has recently ordered the PBOC to maintain a very loose monetary policy, undermining the de-risking measures previously taken. But it has stopped short of a stimulus policy, as it continues its crusade against financial risk.
As a shifting global balance slows China on its way to the harmonious society imagined by Xi Jinping, the central authorities are forced to devise new policies and envision radical reforms. For the sake of the Chinese population, one can hope that the core of these reforms will be worker protection, universal welfare, and ecological transition.
Shadow banking - 'a time bomb in the making'
Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt. Shadow of the banks While shadow banking in advanced economies has declined since the financial crisis, in China it has been expanding Goldman Sachs, Expanding upon this definition, the BIS outlines five characteristics of Chinese shadow banking. Besides their direct role, banks facilitate shadow credit in various ways.
Official interest rates, which are tightly controlled, have fixed the cost of borrowing below the pace of inflation for decades. Loan volumes are controlled by crude quotas imposed by the central bank. As a result, access to credit is determined not by market forces, but by official decree or personal connections. Those able to borrow, mostly big state-owned firms, have ample opportunity to make extensive and sometimes wasteful investments. Smaller companies are forced to seek out alternative sources of credit at much higher rates.
Consumers who are tired of watching the real value of their savings dwindle in their bank accounts speculate on property or other risky investments. That decision has been praised as a sign that the authorities are finally willing to rein in uncontrolled credit growth. Yet it can also be interpreted as a retrograde step that will reduce the flow of credit to those that do not enjoy official favour. Zhang concludes the only solution is to loosen restrictions on bank interest rates and let the market decide. Its structure is as chaotic as the world he describes.
The text flits between personal anecdote, biographical detail and analytical observation. Terms that might confuse the uninformed reader are not always explained. Nevertheless, these dispatches from the wild lending frontier add colour to a topic that is often lacking details. Mar 06, Julian Haigh rated it liked it. You have to like Joe Zhang as he tells his personal story about the microcredit industry in China.
The shadow banking sector is the only place for many Chinese businesses and Zhang analyses the role of the state in regulation and discusses the place of this subprime sector in the economy… and how to clean it up. Microcredit will continue to increase in importance based on the structural needs of the Chinese economy, but it may have devastating results down the line that are concerns for Zhang.
China holds interest rates far too low at regular banks making money cheap for those that get approved for loans and cheats the regular saver in the market. The danger of money cheaper than inflation has some pretty disturbing deformations on the market providing fertile ground for bubbles. Jul 05, Tirath rated it really liked it. A mini autobiography, hence a little too well-painted in some parts But the author does show China's underbelly in an honest light Hidden inflation Financial repression Circumventing rules in the system, aided by the system A large number of beneficiaries throughout the system And a centrally controlled economy that cant be controlled too well Very good insights into who the beneficiaries of the system are And finally, a bubble that has gone on for too long.
Jul 04, Christophe rated it liked it. Interesting approach from a bottom-up perspective. Very interesting on legal matters, how China has a hard time focusing on local problems. Also, well described microcredit industry, however I would have expected a little more suggestions on the matter and his future goals. View 1 comment. Oct 26, Scott rated it liked it. Interesting insight into micro finance in China. Found the book a bit repetitive at times and the epilogue should have been the prologue.
Also the writing style of the epilogue should have been leverage for the whole book. May 14, Wenlong Sui rated it it was amazing. Might still be the first book on China's shadow banking, at least it is in Amazon. Vineet Tandon rated it it was ok Mar 22, Nudgem rated it really liked it Jan 07, When the Chinese stock market crashed in , the government intervened to prop-up the stock market.
This happened, in part, because the government was concerned about its reputation after encouraging the Chinese populace to put its savings into the stock market. Because financial market actors know that the Chinese government has a laser-like focus on its reputation and is willing to spend enormous amounts of money to protect its reputation, it may also be willing to shore up other parts of the financial system to prevent a damaging collapse.
These financial institutions may also have knowledge of which industries a collapse would affect, such as real estate. Therefore, their insider knowledge and risk-calculus may encourage them to make imprudent lending decisions. In March , the government established a set of rules to limit the sales of off-balance-sheet investments. The effectiveness of this new wave of regulation likely comes from the fact that it targets specific types of financial instruments instead of types of institutions i.
The China Banking Regulatory Commission CBRC has implemented a rule stating that banks may only act as intermediaries in arranging entrusted loans and may not guarantee them. Acting as guarantors for entrusted loans is presumed to be the primary factor in the origination of risky loans. Banks are forbidden from using their own funds for entrusted loans. The CBRC also forbids the use of entrusted loans for a variety of securities including equities, derivatives, and bonds. This measure will likely help to contain the spread of risk throughout the financial system.
Spectators should be cautious in their optimism, however, because borrowers and lenders may invent new arrangements in the shadow banking system that are difficult to detect.