Phantom Democracy: Corporate Interests and Political Power in America

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Phantom Democracy: Corporate Interests and Political Power in America file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Phantom Democracy: Corporate Interests and Political Power in America book. Happy reading Phantom Democracy: Corporate Interests and Political Power in America Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Phantom Democracy: Corporate Interests and Political Power in America at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Phantom Democracy: Corporate Interests and Political Power in America Pocket Guide.

Notes Formerly CIP. Includes bibliographical references p. View online Borrow Buy Freely available Show 0 more links Set up My libraries How do I set up "My libraries"? Australian National University Library. Open to the public. Open to the public ; held Book English University of Adelaide. Barr Smith Library.

Open to the public ; University Library. Open to the public ; held Book English Show 0 more libraries None of your libraries hold this item. Found at these bookshops Searching - please wait We were unable to find this edition in any bookshop we are able to search. These online bookshops told us they have this item:. Tags What are tags? Add a tag. Public Private login e. Add a tag Cancel Be the first to add a tag for this edition.

Lists What are lists? Login to add to list. Be the first to add this to a list. Technique s. According to the online Merriam-Webster Dictionary,the subsequent definitions of democracyinclude: 1 A government by the people--especially rule of the majority; 2 A government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections; 3 A political unit that has a democratic government; 4 Capitalized Democracy includes the principles and policies of the Democratic Party in the United States from emancipation Republicanism to New Deal Democracy--C.

Roberts ; 5 The common people especially when constituting the source of political authority; and 6 The absence of hereditary or arbitrary class distinctions or privileges Merriam-Webster Dictionary, All the rest are nothing more than what. The representational version of American democracy really boils down the monetary vote Joseph, Money is on par with freedom. Both are commodities. This commoditization of freedom rings loudly in this Corporate States of America. Simply put, the more money one has, the more votes one buys. The more votes one buys, the more power one privatizes.

The more power one privatizes, the more corrupt one becomes. Corporatism Italian corporativismo , also called corporativism, is The theory and practice of organizing society into corporations subordinate to the state. According to corporatist theory, workers and employers would be organized into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and controlling to a large extent the persons and activities within their jurisdiction.


  1. Pursuit home;
  2. Up the Creek (Gay Briefs);
  3. Find a copy in the library.
  4. Phantom democracies | Pursuit by The University of Melbourne.
  5. Conversation - Score.
  6. Catholic Answers To Anglican Objections.

Thus state corporatism strongly correlates to neo-corporatism. In this system, society is seen as a corporate THE U. By controlling the political institutions and mechanisms to advance economic elite interests, the American corporate class selects its own rank-and-files.

In this dysfunctional representational democratic project, a redefinition of the term democracy necessitates its negation. To de-democratize democracy leads to its negated form of dedemocratization. The ensuing newer terms are appropriate descriptions of this current corporate capitalist paradigm relevant to the de-democratization of the Corporate States of America.


  • Living Democracy - David Korten.
  • Inside Chinas Shadow Banking: The Next Subprime Crisis?.
  • chapter and author info.
  • God And Man - Book Three (The Word of God Encyclopedia 2).
  • In fact, it is expensive for those who cannot afford this valuable commodity and free to the corporate bourgeoisie. There are two types of freedom: positive and negative. Under corporate tyranny, negative freedom s reign benefiting the corporate haves in the Global North at the expense of the Global South. Corporate capitalist evolution in a de-democratized existence is survival of the greediest. Their numbers are increasing.

    Consider the following official statistics from the U. Census Bureau. Roughly fifteen percent Their numbers increased from In term of.

    How Donald Trump Could Build an Autocracy in the U.S. - The Atlantic

    In children under the age of eighteen living in poverty was Those between the ages of 18 to 64 stood at People aged 65 and older living in povertystood roughly at 9 percent. Although non-Hispanic Euro-Americans comprised the majority of the total population If his premise is true, then by the same token, in terms of gravitational standards based on the Body Mass Index B. Despite all the rhetoric from the establishment about external official enemies possessing their weaponsof-mass-destruction, the primary instrument of thought control in democratic societies is the corporate media monopolies.

    These are unquestioned social institutions deceiving the non critical mass with corporate-created illusions of material consumption, entertainment, and necessary illusions Chomsky, Necessary illusions: Thought control in democratic societies, 7. These corporate media monopolies are weapons-of-mass-deception WMDs in this plastic culture.

    Indoctrinated as patriotic consumers and entertained spectators, Americans chase more after material wants rather than material needs. In this Me-Me-Me corporatocracy we consume therefore we are. Free market corporate globalization and its mechanisms equate to existential weapons-of-mass-consumtpion. Implementation As stated above, the objective of interdisciplinary research and writing is to attain cognitive advancement Boix Mansilla, A specific purpose will focus on the forces of globalization-from-below Doan, d. These forces-of-resistance are struggling against totalitarian capitalism Liodakis, and its predatory globalization Falk, The subsequent model proposed by this author is an inclusive one dealing with legal mandates, ethical behavior and sustainable economics leading to a democratically controlled economy advancing the common good.

    Furthermore, it is the consequence s of an action dictating the course of its action but. NOT vice versa is amoral. Corporate capitalism is an amoral economic mode-of-production with only one objective of profit-maximization. American corporate elites within the transnational capitalist class minority Sklair, enriched themselves at the expense of the global majority. This is a contradiction to the aforementioned Utilitarian principle of morality.

    It is consistent with the Consequential principle of amorality. This author also contends that corporate capitalism is the bastardization of what Adam Smith who was a moral philosopher nonetheless argued in his two-volume treatise regarding the political economy of capitalism Planetary existence is at a crossroad being dichotomized by two simple courses of action if we choose to take them. Either we choose 1 the current corporate-capitalist-imperialistparadigm of continuity or 2 resistance-from-below for the sake of survival Chomsky, Hegemony or survival: America's quest for global dominance, What will it take to reach a paradigm shift from an economic corporatocracy to an economic democracy?

    This model proposes the following solutions relevant to the macro-paradigm of business ethics Heath, ; Rendtorff, Re-constituting legal mandates where economic concentration is not only serving corporate interests but also for the common good. Corporate entities will show respect and obedience to the rule of law like everyone else. All corporations are to be sanctioned equally under this rule of law. Klein, ethical business conduct must take into account these legal mandates including the common good Anderson, ; Kelly, ; Maitland, ; Nielsen, ; Sternberg, ; Rawls, ; Solomon, ; Smith, ; Wicksteed, Within this common good are basic principles of universal inalienable rights including but not limited to 1 human and animal rights, 2 gender equality, 3 organized labor, 4 environmental liberation, etc.

    The objective of this model is to shift from the current amoral, malfunctioning, malevolent, and bastardized capitalist mode-of-production basing itself on short term profitability to a new economics based on long term sustainability Large, Kelly prescribed the following Principles of Economic Democracy and their correlates to dethrone the corporate aristocracy: 1 Principle of Enlightenment: All persons workers and their communities are created equal and have the same economic rights as their employers; 2 Principle of Equality: Corporate wealth are de-privatized and communal wealth belong to all stockholders and stakeholders alike ; 3 Principle of the Public Good: Protection of the common welfare of all citizens; 4 Principle of Democracy: Corporate entities are best governed by democratic means; 5 Principle of Justice: Corporate personhood and rights are unconstitutional and delegitimatized; and 6 Principle of R evolution: Democratic abolition and overthrow of non-democratic tyrannies including corporate entities Kelly, Through an interdisciplinary critique Rendtorff synthetized insights from business studies, sociology, political science, jurisprudence, and philosophy to enlighten those readers who are serious enough to work toward changes to make capitalism more responsible, ethical, and legitimate.

    Conclusion This paper is a matter of free speech as stipulated via Constitutional dictates. Such stigmas are more common in totalitarian states i. Dissent is among the axiomatic ingredients of a real democratic stew. These reactionaries do not believe in genuine freedom of speech, unless they themselves are speaking freely or are in agreement with whatever speech they want to hear. Attending religious services listening to theocentric redundancy is a prime example. This denial of imperial ambitions is so obvious to historical victims of American gangster aggression Atwood, rendering this phenomenon close to being Cartesian common sense among these historical victims.

    Joint vision America's military preparing for tomorrow. Washington, DC: U. Grupp, J. Corporatism: The secret government of the New World Order. Progressive Press. Kelly, M. The divine right of capital: Dethroning the corporate aristocracy. Perkins, J. Confessions of an economic hit man. Wiist, W. Citizens United, public health, and democracy: The Supreme Court's ruling, its implications, and proposed action.

    American Journal of Public Health,7, Assessing student work at interdisciplinary crossroads. Change, 37 1 , Political Science Atwood, P. War is the American way of life. New England Journal of. Towards a new Cold War: U. Second ed. Economics Chesnais, F. The economic foundations of contemporary imperialism. Koninklijke Brill, NV. Leiben: The Netherlands.

    READ FREE FULL Phantom Democracy: Corporate Interests and Political Power in America READ Ebook

    Globalization and its discontents. New York, NY: W. Sociology Kerbo, H. Social stratification and inequality: Class conflict in historical, comparative and global perspectives. Nader, R. House of Representatives. Third ed. Yates, M. More unequal: Aspects of class in the United States. Monthly Review,59 6 , Evidence from the Disciplinary Sources Political Science. Aldrich, J. Foreign policy and the electoral connection. Imperial overstretch: GeorgeW.

    Bush and the hubris of empire. Chomsky, N. Contradictions in U. Interviewed by S. Khadloy, Eds. The Brown Journal of World Affairs,14 2 , pp. March Report on the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Hope or hype? Legitimacy and US leadership in a global age. Corporate welfare in the federal budget.

    Corporate tax reform: Issues for Congress. Huff, D. Phantom wealth: Public relief for corporate welfare. Social Work, 38 3 , CQ Researcher, 22 24 , Retrieved from www. Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Kaase, M. Democracy and political action. When corporations rule the world. Office of Management and Budget. Analytical perspectives: Budget of the U. Budget of the United States government, FY Introduction: The triumph of upper America. In Readings and documents in post U. Public Citizen. Citizens United: One year later. The corporate welfare budget bigger than ever.

    Demystifying globalization. Lilley, Capital and its discontents: Conversations with radical thinkers in a time of tumult pp. Potter, D. Smith, D. Direct democracy, public opinion, and candidate choice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74 1 , The arrogance of American power: What U.

    Valladao, A. Democratic hegemony and American hegemony. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 19 2 , Take the rich off welfare. Economics Agnew, J. American hegemony into American empire? Lessons from the invasion of. Antipode, Hegemony: The new shape of global power. Bose, P. Historical Materialism 15 , 95— Leiben, TheNetherlands. Marx, international political economy and globalization. Director interlocks and the political behavior of corporations and corporate elites.

    Social Science Quarterly, 72 3 , Austin, TX: University of Texas.

    Account Options

    The two faces of capital: Corporations and individual capitalists as political actors. American Sociological Review, 66 3 , Globalization and privatization: Two faces one coin. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 74 , EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. Domhoff, G. State and ruling class in corporate America. Levine, Enriching the sociological imagination: How radical sociology changed the discipline pp. Dye, T. Governmental and corporate elites: Convergence and differentiation.

    The Journal of Politics, 36 4 , Predatory globalization: A critique. Fusfeld, D. The rise of the corporate state in America. Journal of Economic Issues, 6 1 , Class conflict, corporate power, and macroeconomic policy: The impact of inflation in the post-war period. Journal of Economic Issues, 25 2 , Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. Kellner, D. Theorizing globalization. Sociological Theory, 20 3 , Knight, A. Empire, hegemony and globalization in the Americas. The great turning: From empire to Earth community.

    Agenda for a new economy: From phantom wealth to real wealth. When corporations rule the world Second ed. Liodakis, G. Totalitarian capitalism and beyond. Marx, K. Manifesto of the Communist Party. Moore, Trans. Corporate rule: Understanding and challenging the New World Order. Nitzan, J. Regimes of differential accumulation: Mergers, stagflation and the logic of globalization. Review of International Political Economy, 8 2 , Beyond nation-state paradigms: Globalization, sociology, and the challenge of transnational.

    Sociological Forum, 13 4 , Interlocking directorates and the corporate revolution. Social Science History, 7 2 , Soref, M. Social class and a division of labor within the corporate elite: A note on class, interlocking, and executive committee membership of directors of US industrial firms.

    The Sociological Quarterly, 17 3 , Class hegemony and political finance: Presidential campaign contributions of wealthy capitalist families. American Sociological Review, 54 2 , The Journal of Politics,36 4 , Polity, 15 2 , PalgraveMacmillan Journals. Social structure and politics in American history. The American Historical Review, 87 5 , The new class society: Good bye American dream? Sallach, D. Class domination and ideological hegemony. The Sociological Quarterly, 15 1 , Domhoff's contribution. Contemporary Sociology, 14 2 , Final Integration and Implementation Anderson, E.

    The ethical limitations of the market.

    Equality, moral incentives, and the market: An essay in utopian politicoeconomic theory. Necessary illusions: Thought control in democratic societies. The Nation, pp. Hegemony or survival: America's quest for global dominance. The United States has essentially a one-party system. In Oxford dictionaries. Retrieved from. In Merriam-Webster dictionary. September Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: Government Printing Office.

    Economic democracy: The working class alternatives to capitalism. Falk, R. Hardt, M. Heath, E. Heath, Ed. Joseph, P. Zeitgeist: Moving Forward [Documentary]. Klein, E. People first! Professional and business ethics without ethics. Burlington, NJ: Ashgate Publishing. Large, M. Common wealth: For a free, equal, mutual and sustainable society. Maitland, I. The limits of business self-regulation. Heath Ed. A moral case for socialism. Rawls, J.

    A theory of justice.

    What is Kobo Super Points?

    Rendtorff, J. Responsibility, ethics and legitimacy of corporations. Sklair, L. Smith, A. Of prudence. Solomon, R. An Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Sternberg, E. The nature of business. Stiglitz, J. Is there a post-Washington Consensus consensus? Business and the economic nexus. Additional Sources Atwood, P. New England Journal of Public. What we say goes: Conversations on U. New York, NY: Metropolitan. Doan, P. Conflicts and commonalities in political science, economics, and sociology. Table 1. Corporatocracy redefined. Globalization from below: It is up to US to resist.

    Corruption is Legal in America

    PowerPoint presentation. Repko, A. Interdisciplinary research. Snow, N. Politics boils down to who gets what, where, when, and how. Politico-economic power is privatized by the corporate minority at the expense of the global majority. Corporate control of the domestic politicalinstitutions and mechanisms to serve corporate economicinterests.

    The evolution of corporate capitalism worsens socioeconomic mobility among the social classes. One commonality among all three corporate, middle, and lower classes is being a part of this democratic project pursuing the American dream. For those in the corporate class this American dream had been reached. But for the rest, this American dream is turning into a socioeconomic nightmare. The American corporate bourgeoisie selects and elects only those within their sociopolitical ranks i.

    The more capital one has, the more votes one buys. See More. Logically, whatever courses of actions follow, THE U.



admin